<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">  
  <channel>         
    <title>auteurs : Mathilde Bernard</title>    
    <link>https://shakespeare.edel.univ-poitiers.fr:443/shakespeare/index.php?id=542</link>
    <description>Index des publications de auteurs Mathilde Bernard</description>
    <language>fr</language>    
    <ttl>0</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>« Carnage affreux » et « cruauté execrable » : poétique du récit de massacre à la Renaissance</title>  
      <link>https://shakespeare.edel.univ-poitiers.fr:443/shakespeare/index.php?id=541</link>
      <description>During the Religious Wars, both Catholic and Protestant people slaughtered men of the opposite party. The historians who reported those events, beyond their differences and oppositions, wrote in very similar manners. As Europeans civilizations, in the heart of a particularly violent period, became aware of the limits of their humanist philosophy and of their blazing optimism, one can wonder what the permanence of stylistic features exactly means and if it can be read as the consequence of a denial of the thought? If narratives of slaughters are topoi, what do they reveal on the way the Renaissance dealt with its own violence? Do those writings (from moderate Catholic historians like Jacques-Auguste de Thou, anonymous writers from the League, Protestant memorialists like Simon Goulart, or explorers coming back from America – Jérôme Benzoni, Urbain Chauveton –) allow History to become a field of experiences and to take on didactic characteristics? </description>
      <pubDate>lun., 21 nov. 2011 15:24:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>jeu., 10 févr. 2022 05:13:47 +0100</lastBuildDate>      
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://shakespeare.edel.univ-poitiers.fr:443/shakespeare/index.php?id=541</guid>
    </item>         </channel>
</rss>